The state of health care . . .
Stories in the Post and the Times over the weekend reported Government’s concern over its shortage of nurses, other health workers and essential services. These stories suggest a wealth of quick follows that could bring both problems and solutions to light — and give a glimpse of the overall state of health care here.
What is a day in a life of a nurse here like now? How have pay and benefits changed in recent years and what have been the effects of those changes? What happens when a patient needs an ambulance at Livingstone General Hospital? And how does all of this affect people with needs for ongoing care — for high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, cancer — as well as for HIV and tuberculosis? A day following one patient could offer valuable information on gaps in a system that policy makers and donors are seeking to strengthen.
That information is needed — and reporters can be the ones to provide it — if the well-publicized roll-outs of effort and resources to address malaria and HIV are to do their greatest good, and in fact, not detract from overall health services.
In the last couple of weeks reports and opinion pieces have suggested areas that would be interesting to follow here:
This piece by Mark Green, Managing Director of Malaria No More’s Malaria Policy Center in Washington, DC., argues that coordinating efforts to prevent and treat malaria with efforts to address neglected tropical diseases would help strengthen health services in general — particularly in remote areas where the gaps are the greatest now. The Tropical Disease Research Center in Ndola, which has studies neglected tropical diseases could be a good place to start.
This piece, on http://www.globalhealthmagazine.com looks at how, with urbanization, Africa “has acquired the so-called diseases of the wealthy, but without the wealth.” Examining the toll of mental illness, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer here — one of the most urbanized countries in Southern Africa — would provide essential services to readers. What are people doing differently, and what health-harming behaviors are preventable and avoidable? And of course, how does the health care system need to adapt to the rising burden of unpublicized public health threats?
Are prevention strategies working?
Finally, this New York Times story brings good news, but the reminder that while “more than a million people were put on drugs in the past year — drugs they will need for the rest of their lives — 2.7 million people were newly infected with H.I.V. in 2007, the latest year for which there were estimates” demands a local look at prevention strategies, including in health care settings.
And, an addition to the Bad Words List
” . . . he said, in a speech read for him by . . .”
Okay, that’s a combination of words, but it is a phrase that confuses me. If someone “says” something, the words come out of that person’s mouth. That person is present, and can then answer a question that may be raised by those words. But too often reporters writing stories from the transcripts of speeches don’t ask those questions — or have the opportunity to ask them — because the author of the speech being reported isn’t actually there. It would be good to make that clearer from the start: “a government spokesperson said today that . . . ” followed by “he was reading a speech from . . .” Then, ask the questions raised by the speech. The answers could always provide a good follow-up story.